16 Aralık 2012 Pazar

Propaganda War on Syria Rages

To contact us Click HERE

Propaganda War on Syria Rages
by Stephen Lendman
Propaganda wars precede hot ones. Conflicts and other forms of violence are glorified in the name of peace. Doublespeak duplicity claim it. Wars are waged to prevent it. 
Ongoing ones assure more ahead. Unconscionable death counts rise. America, Israel, key NATO partners, and regional allies bear full responsibility. Humanity hangs in the balance.
Humanitarian intervention and responsibility to protect (R2P) mask ravaging one country after another. Slaughter and mass destruction are called liberating struggles. 
Plunder is for economic development. Exploitation and dominance are called democracy building. Media scoundrels invert truth for public support.
When America goes to war or plans them, they march obediently in lockstep. Administration, congressional and Pentagon propaganda get reported as news and information.
Big Lies make headlines. They're repeated ad nauseam. Media scoundrels are so addicted to lying, perhaps their employment contracts mandate misinformation, deceit and distortion while avoiding truth at all cost.
What better way to explain scoundrel journalism. Fundamental good reporting principles are spurned. Ethical standards are ignored.
The history of sensationalism, yellow journalism, and lying about what matters most in America is long and sordid. It dates back centuries. Accurate reporting is most important when lives, human welfare, and perhaps humanity are on the line.
Television is worst of all. In a June 1950 commencement address, Boston University President Daniel Marsh said, "If the (television) craze continues....we are destined to have a nation of morons."
Famed comedian Ernie Kovacs (1919 - 1962) once called it a medium because it's neither rare or well done. 
He'd be horrified by what goes on now. It fails on all counts. So do scoundrel print media. They give news, information, and opinion reporting bad names. 
Long before television arrived, journalist Walter Lippmann called the public "the bewildered herd." In policy matters, they're considered "spectators," not "participants." 
"The common interests elude public opinion entirely," he said. That's how it should be, he added. 
America's privileged class alone should manage policy. Only they need proper education and training. Treat others like mushrooms - well-watered and in the dark. Distract them with bread and circuses. Misinform them with managed and junk food news.
Media scoundrels betray the reading and viewing public. They're best served by walking away, tuning out, and choosing credible sources for what they most need to know. Greater numbers now do it. One day perhaps everyone will.
Scoundrel media wars rage against Syria. People are being systematically lied to and manipulated to accept more war. Western-recruited proxies wage it no-holds barred. They specialize in gruesome atrocities. Managed news reports suppress them.
Full-scale intervention looms. It could happen anytime. Early next year looks most likely.
Global Research associate Julie Levesque highlights " 'chemical propaganda' and fabricated evidence." When threats don't exist, they're invented. 
When headlined enough most people believe them. War followed hyping nonexistent Iraq WMDs for months. False claims precede all wars. They're based on lies and deception. It happens every time.
No matter how often people are fooled, they're easy to deceive again. They're being prepared for full-scale war on Syria. It's deja vu all over again.
Michel Chossudovsky highlighted the "Syria Chemical Weapons Saga." Perhaps another "US-NATO Humanitarian Disaster" awaits. It's likely given how often the same scenario played out earlier.
After detailed planning and implementation, it's hard imagining Washington now going soft. Don't expect it. It won't happen. Before Syrian ravaging ends, it may exceed the worst of charnel house Libya.
With about four times the population, imagine the possible death, injury, and mass destruction toll. Imagine potential cutthroat killer Islamofascist rule replacing Assad governance most Syrians support.
Libya 2.0 on a much uglier scale looks possible. Chemical propaganda and other misreporting precede what looks likely.
Chossudovsky says people are being manipulated to believe "that a 'frustrated' and 'desperate' (Assad) is planning to use deadly chemical weapons against his own people."
Doing so would be like putting a gun to his head and pulling the trigger. The possibility of using them internally is nil except perhaps against NATO foreign invaders. Even then it's unlikely unless Western WMDs are used on Syrians.
Managed news reports invent the worst about Assad. Chossudovsky quoted NBC News claiming "Syria's military has loaded nerve-gas chemicals into bombs and are awaiting final orders from al-Assad."
Media hype rages "full gear." "Fake reports" make headline news. We've heard it all before many times. It's repeated because it works. Only the war theaters, heads of state, and fakery vary.
Otherwise it's an old script rerun. Propaganda films follow at times. History is re-invented. Facts are turned on their head. Bad guys are them, not us. The worst of all possible worlds is called the best.
An ending too gruesome to imagine perhaps looms. Humanity may not survive. America's imperium matters most. Those in charge go for broke, and let the devil take the hindmost.
That's how imperial rogues think. Media scoundrels share responsibility. Thoughts of blood on their hands never enter their minds. Only wealth, power, privilege, dominance, and winner take all matter.
Body counts are a small price to pay. It's hard imagining how these people were raised. Perhaps they forgot moral lessons taught. Maybe they remember but don't care. It shows in what they support and tolerate.
Wednesday reports hyped Abbas firing scud missiles inside Syria. Western headlines feature it. Unnamed US officials are sources. Ones preferring anonymity lack credibility. So do journalists using them.
At issue isn't whether scuds, other missiles or rockets are used. It's implying use of or plans to use chemical weapons. 
Reports follow scurrilous ones about Assad loading sarin nerve agents or other deadly chemicals in bombs. They also suggest intensified Assad belligerence. Implied is that more civilians in his line of fire are dying.
At her daily press briefing, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said:
"As the regime becomes more and more desperate, we see it resorting to increased lethality and more vicious weapons moving forward, and we have in recent days seen missiles deployed."
She added that Washington is concerned about a weapon called a "barrel (incendiary) bomb." She said it contains inflammable materials. Human Rights Watch claimed he used them. More on that below.
"It's sort of a napalm-like thing and is completely indiscriminate in terms of civilians, so very, very concerning and indicative of the regime's desperation and the regime's brutality," said Nuland.
What's most "indicative" is ignoring America's longstanding use of napalm, agent orange in Southeast Asia, biological and chemical poisons, depleted and enriched uranium weapons, as well as other illegal toxins. It's official US policy in all wars Washington wages.
Large areas of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Vietnam and elsewhere America attacked aren't safe to live it. Toxicity levels are too high. Uranium contamination is permanent. 
No evidence whatever shows Assad uses chemical or other toxins. Suggesting he does or may hypes fear ahead of likely full-scale intervention.
On December 13, his Foreign and Expatriates Ministry "denied as untrue rumors about the Syrian Arab Army using Scud Missiles to confront the armed terrorist groups."
It responded to falsely circulating claims. It named Turkey and partnered countries conspiring against Syria.
On December 12, Human Rights Watch (HRW) was back to its old tricks. It shills for US direct and proxy wars as well as others planned. It features anti-Assad propaganda. It headlined "Syria: Incendiary Weapons Used in Populated Areas."
It claimed Assad used them "in at least four locations….since mid-November." Anti-Assad witnesses said so. Unverified video footage was shown. It's been fake before. It's simple to do.
HRW admitted it's "investigating unconfirmed reports of the use of incendiary weapons in (various) parts of Syria." Proper analysis demands doing so first, finding clear evidence if it exists, then reporting the findings.
HRW so far has nothing more than dubious video evidence and suspect witnesses. They're not named or identified. Numerous earlier reports were falsified. 
No verifiable evidence suggests this one is legitimate. HRW's last comment said "Syria is not known to be a producer or exporter of incendiary weapons." It claims a stockpile of Soviet origin remains.
If any were obtained that long ago, their usefulness may have expired. Chemical and biological weapons lose potency over time. Their shelf life is limited. Perhaps it's true also for incendiaries.
The New York Times was most responsible for misreporting on non-existent Iraq chemical weapons. Judith Miller's rewritten daily front page Pentagon handouts proved effective propaganda. 
Her writing became a weapon of mass destruction. She featured an entire Noah's Ark of scam artists hyping fake threats. War followed. The "cradle of civilization" was destroyed. 
Iraq is permanently occupied. Libya followed. Afghanistan boils. Syria looms. The Times plays the lead propaganda role. Miller is gone, but other disreputable writers replaced her. No shortage exists in Times Square or foreign venues.
On December 12, Michael Gordon and Eric Schmitt headlined "Syria Uses Scud Missiles in New Effort to Push Back Rebels."
Both writers called a Western-generated foreign invasion a "civil war." Nothing "civil" characterizes what's going on. Neither one explained.
At least six "Soviet-designed" scuds were fired. They're "not known for their precision." Obama's red line stresses using chemical weapons internally.
Assad may have calculated he "can resort to such lethal weapons without the fear of international intervention…."
Former Army intelligence officer Joseph Holliday was quoted saying he "views every weapon short of chemicals as fair game."
He "escalated its use of force whenever the rebels' strength has presented a significant challenge to the regime."
The detailed article omitted heavy weapons supplied foreign fighters. It ignored their atrocities. They're committed regularly. Pro-Assad loyalists are targeted. Civilian neighborhoods are raided. Slaughter follows. Neither writer explained.
Death squads are considered liberators. They're not "rebels." They're foreign mercenary killers. They're paid or otherwise enlisted to murder and destroy. 
Their ranks are infested with Islamofascists. Syrians deplore what they represent. They have no say in what Washington plans. No do civilians in other US targeted countries. 
Rogue states demand unchallenged dominance. Popular sentiment isn't tolerated. Imperial wars rage. The entire region and beyond is threatened. 
Potential death and mass destruction too gruesome to imagine looms. Stay tuned. More reports will follow.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity."
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Holding Israel Accountable

To contact us Click HERE

Holding Israel Accountable
by Stephen Lendman
For decades, world leaders let Israel get away with murder. The Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) said enough is enough. It wants Israeli officials held accountable.
It launched a "Palestine to the ICC" campaign. It wants relevant stakeholders involved. They include Palestine, ICC chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, and enough world leaders who matter.
It wants them to "fulfill their responsibilities" to ensure long delayed justice and redress for decades of horrendous Israeli crimes against Palestinians.
The ICC is a permanent tribunal. It was established to prosecute individuals for crimes of war, against humanity and genocide. In 2017, it's jurisdiction extends to criminal aggression.
On July 1, 2002, it was established by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. It's history isn't encouraging. It serves wealth and power. It's an imperial tool.
It targets victims, not perpetrators. It prosecutes individuals Western powers designate.
Jose Luis Moreno-Ocampo was Bensouda's predecessor. He followed American orders and obeyed. 
He ignored horrendous US crimes of war and against humanity in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and elsewhere. He did nothing about similar Israeli crimes. 
He rejected Palestine's bid to investigate Israel's Cast Lead criminality. PA officials sought court action under the Rome Statute's Article 12(3). 
Ocampo's reasoning was spurious. He claimed "only internationally recognized states can join the court." His official statement said:
"(T)he current status granted to Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly is that of 'observer,' not as a 'Non-member State,' (and only) relevant bodies at the United Nations" or group of states that make up the court may decide if Palestinians can become part of the Rome Statute.
"(T)he Office has assessed that it is for the relevant bodies at the United Nations or the Assembly of States Parties to make the legal determination whether Palestine qualifies as a State for the purpose of acceding to the Rome Statute and thereby enabling the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court."  
"The Rome Statute provides no authority for the Office of the Prosecutor to adopt a method to define the term 'State.' "
Palestine has been a state for over 24 years. Most nations recognize it. On November 29, UN Member States overwhelmingly upgraded its status.
Ocampo obeyed orders from Washington and Tel Aviv. He disregarded Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It states: 
"(N)o distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty."
Ocampo charged Gaddafi and others Washington wanted prosecuted. He shamed the office he held.
Will things change now?
On June 15, 2012, Fatou Bensouda replaced him. She's a Gambian lawyer and former state criminal law prosecutor. She also served as International Bank for Commerce (Gambia) general manager.
From 2001 - 2004, she was International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda legal advisor. Before becoming chief ICC prosecutor, she was Ocampo's deputy from September 2004 - June 2012.
On June 14, 2012, the London Guardian called her "the woman who could redeem the international criminal court." Don't bet on it.
It's entire history is appalling. It contravened its mandate to end impunity for "unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock the conscience of humanity."
Its caseload is exclusively African. It chooses soft, Western designated targets. It's hard imagining Bensouda changing longstanding policy. 
She has a lot of proving to do. She was Yahya Jammeh's criminal prosecutor. 
He seized power in a July 1994 military coup. He staged three fake elections to solidify control. He's ruled tiny Gambia ruthlessly for 18 years. He's a brutal despot.
His decrees denied all human rights. Opponents are ruthlessly targeted. Free expression is suppressed. Torture is commonplace. Forced disappearances, extrajudicial assassinations, kangaroo court trials, and other abusive practices define his governance.
According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Gambia is "one of the most repressive countries for journalists in Africa."
Bensouda has much to answer for. Why was she Jammeh's state prosecutor? Why did she serve under Ocampo? What evidence suggests she'll make a difference now? Nothing in her professional background suggests it.
PCHR hopes for the best. It "demand(s) accountability for the countless Palestinian victims who have been denied access to justice for so long."
The Rome Statute recognizes that "all people are united by common bonds, their cultures pieced together in a shared heritage."
Universally recognized human rights are systematically spurned. Palestinians have been denied theirs for over 64 years. Occupation harshness is brutal. Besieged Gazans suffer most of all. 
Conditions each year worsen. Collective punishment is official Israeli policy. It's enforced ruthlessly. Civilians are prime targets. Children and infants aren't spared.
World leaders able to act, don't. Proper investigations aren't conducted. Ocampo spurned Palestinian rights. He stuck his thumb in the eye of justice. His entire tenure reflected disdain for what's right.
PCHR wants the ICC to uphold its mandate. It's the principle independent body able to investigate crimes of war, against humanity, and genocide thoroughly.
PCHR's "Palestine to the ICC" wants relevant stakeholders to ensure Palestinian rights are addressed. 
Palestine must first sign and ratify the Rome Statute. It must "lodge a declaration with the Court’s Registrar under Article 11(2) and 12(3) of the Statute, accepting the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court from the date of entry into force of the Statute, 1 July 2002."
Bensouda must then do her job. She must initiate an investigation proprio motu (on her own accord). It must examine Israeli crimes or war, against humanity and genocide.
She must request Pre-Trial Chamber authorization to investigate, pursuant to the Statute's Article 15. 
She must "reopen the preliminary examination, and take into account the proper elements in order to finally open an investigation into the situation in Palestine."
She must then bring the issue before the Pre-trial Chamber for judicial determination.
Enough world leaders must support Palestinian efforts for justice. Their only recourse so far has been to petition Israel's Military Advocate General (for criminal violations) and the compensation officer of Israel's Ministry of Defense (for civil matters).
Previous efforts through Israeli courts proved futile. They systematically spurn Palestinian rights.
PCHR said it worked many years within Israel's judicial system. The experience "unequivocally prove(d) that (it's) incapable of ensuring an effective remedy for Palestinian victims." 
"This conclusion was confirmed by" the UN Cast Lead Committee of Experts. It said "the official inquiry must be conducted by a truly independent body, given the obvious conflict inherent in the military’s examining its own role in designing and executing ‘Operation Cast Lead.' "
Israel operated unaccountably for decades. Pillar of Cloud followed Cast Lead. What's next? How much more indiscriminate slaughter and mass destruction is tolerable.
How many more years of Palestinian suffering will world leaders permit? How much longer can the ICC spurn its mandate? It's time for all relevant stakeholders to step up to the plate and act responsibly.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity."
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Complex Chavez Recovery

To contact us Click HERE

Complex Chavez Recovery
by Stephen Lendman
Major surgery for any reason is daunting. Imagine four times in 18 months for the same illness. On December 11, Chavez underwent it to remove cancerous tissue.
Malignancy reappeared weeks after examination revealed he was cancer free. Post-surgical chemotherapy, radiation, and other treatment now follow. 
Hopefully it'll prove effective. He's too important to lose. He's Latin America's most charismatic leader since Fidel Castro. They inspire others to emulate their example.
Castro recovered from his own major gastrointestinal surgery. At the time, false reports pronounced him dead or dying. They were little more than wishful thinking.
Dark forces wanted him eliminated for decades. Even in semi-retirement they want him gone. He recovered well. It took time. It generally does for people in their 80s. 
In August, he turned 86. Hopefully he has many productive years ahead. His intellect remains acute. His perceptiveness is keen.
His knowledge of vital issues is impressive. His honesty and integrity are impeccable. His forthrightness is noteworthy. He and Chavez mean so much to so many.
At 58, Chavez is younger. Hopefully his age and inner strength will bring full recovery.
On December 12, Vice President Nicolas Maduro said it began after undergoing six hours of successful surgery. He called the operation "complex." 
He said "special treatments" are needed. The post-operative process will be "complicated and difficult," he added. 
Chavez is getting the finest care at Havana's Medical Surgical Research Center (CIMEQ). He's in good hands. It's Cuba's best equipped hospital. It provides world-class treatment.
Addressing Venezuelans on national television and radio, Maduro said, "We are talking until dawn about the details of President Chavez's operation.
On December 12, Vice President Rafael Ramirez and National Assembly President Diosdado Cabello returned home from Cuba. 
Minister of Science and Technology Jorge Arreaza and Attorney General Cilia Flores remained in Havana. Together with Fidel and Raul Castro, they're monitoring Chavez's condition.
Maduro said surgery "was complicated, difficult and delicate, which tells us that the post-operative process is going to be complicated and difficult."
"We shall be in regular contact with the medical teams, always with the objectivity which must guide the management of this situation."
He added that before leaving for Cuba, Chavez called on Venezuelans "to be serenely prepared to confront these hard, complicated and difficult days which it has befallen us to experience, and they can only be confronted with the unity of the people, the political and social forces of the revolution, and men and women in the street."
He urged opposition elements to halt their speculation, lies and vitriol. Referring to Sunday's gubernatorial and legislative elections, Maduro said Venezuelans "are more united than ever spiritually and politically in loyalty to Chavez and our people."
During surgery, internal bleeding occurred. It was corrected. Mayo Clinic cancer expert, Dr. Julian Molina, said it's not unusual when surgery to remove malignant tissue occurs multiple times in the same place.
On Thursday, Chavez improved. Maduro said his condition changed from "stable to favorable."
"That allows us to continue saying that there is growing recovery in (his) situation," he added. Prayer vigils continue for his recovery. Uncertainty prevails. Venezuelans hope for the best. 
Proper care, love, inner strength, and time are nature's best healers. Hopefully in combination they'll restore Chavez to full health.
Venezuelan television aired video opening with him saying "I am no longer myself. I am the people." Venezuelans of all ages followed, adding "I am Chavez."
Other programming showed him singing folk songs with supporters and reciting poetry. Venezuelans express justifiable concerns. They pray. They hope for the best. In the fullness of time they'll know.
Chavista politician/academic Aristobulo Isturiz said "as we pray, we should be ready to turn our sadness and pain into a force that can mobilize the people."
It's unclear if Chavez can return for his January 10 inauguration. Constitutional law requires new elections if he's not back within 30 days. 
Information Minister Ernesto Villegas said Venezuelans "should be prepared to understand" whatever happens. "It would be irresponsible to hide the delicacy of the present moment and the days to come."
It's unconscionable not to pray for his full recovery. He's too important to lose. More than Venezuela is at stake.
On December 12, the Havana Times headlined "Chavez's Future Means Unknowns for Cuba," saying:
The future of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) without Chavez hangs in the balance. Founded in 2004, it grew to eight countries. 
They include Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Dominica, Antigua & Barbuda, Ecuador, and St. Vincent & the Grenadines.
It's a cooperative system of goods and services trade outside the exploitive WTO-international banking one.
Its goal is ambitious. It aims for integrating and developing social societies throughout the region. 
It's based on complementarity, not competition; solidarity, not domination; cooperation, not exploitation; and respect for national sovereignty free from predatory countries and corporate giants.
What will happen without Chavez? How will Cuba be affected? It depends on Venezuelan cooperation. It gets 100,000 daily barrels of oil on "highly concessional terms."
In return, Havana provides medical and educational services. Cuba expert Arturo Lopez Levy calls the arrangement "the backbone of ALBA."
Before leaving for Cuba, Chavez acknowledged his risks. In case anything happens, he named Vice President Nicolas Maduro his preferred successor. He urged Venezuelans to choose him if new elections are necessary.
Some observers believe National Assembly President Diosdado Cabello may challenge him. He's a longtime close Chavez ally. 
It's thought his influence within Venezuela's military exceeds Maduro's support. Whether or not a power struggle emerges remains to be seen. 
Hopefully Chavez will recover enough to return for his inauguration. Doing so would end speculation provided he regains full health. 
Challenging weeks lie ahead. He's a warrior. He's indomitable. He achieved what few thought possible. Don't count him out.
At the same time, another president is possible. Cuba relies on ALBA trade relations. Losing it would replicate the post-Soviet "Special Period." Crisis conditions followed. Havana hopes that won't repeat.
Levy believes "With or without Chavez, Cuba will have to deepen its transition to a mixed economy and open itself up to foreign capital."
With it come huge risks. In his book titled "Rulers and Ruled in the US Empire," James Petras exposed six myths of direct foreign investment (FI).
(1) It doesn't create new enterprises and market opportunities. It buys privatized and other enterprises. It crowds out local capital and public initiative.
(2) It doesn't enhance export effectiveness. It buys minerals and other resources for export. It doesn't create jobs or stimulate national economies.
(3) It doesn't provide tax revenue and hard currency. It creates more indebtedness and net loss than gain.
(4) Indebtedness to foreign lenders is economically destructive.
(5) It doesn't provide developing countries with needed capital. FI exploits. It doesn't benefit recipient countries.
(6) It doesn't attract further amounts. Capital flows where returns are highest. It's anchored nowhere. It has no national allegiance.
Developing countries benefit most by relying on national ownership and internal investment. FI is predatory. Internally generated growth  works best.
FI favors capital over labor. Political, economic and social inequalities result. From 1980 - 2000, Latin American FI proved socially disastrous. 
Living standards plunged. Unemployment and poverty soared. Cuba knows what happened. Why adopt policies sure to fail. 
Hopefully Raul Castro and other ruling officials will choose ways beneficial for all Cubans. Doing so without ALBA won't be easy. Hopefully it won't come to that, with or without Chavez.
ALBA is mutually beneficial. As long as Venezuela is progressively governed, it won't sacrifice what worked effectively for years. Losing it is likely only if dark forces regain power. 
Nothing suggests it's possible any time soon. Hopefully they're banished forever.
Cuba faces other economic challenges. It suffered Gulf of Mexico oil exploration setbacks. US sanctions create hardships. 
Nicaragua also voiced concerns about Chavez's illness. Since 2007, it got billions of dollars of aid. 
Former Sandinista Renovation Movement (MRS) foreign minister and current National Assembly deputy Victor Hugo Tinoco said:
"The permanent absence of Chavez would pose different scenarios, which would all be adverse for (President Daniel) Ortega since he'd no longer have an unconditional ally in Venezuela."
Saying so, of course, is premature. At the same time, Nicaragua relies heavily on Venezuelan cooperation. Tinoco said $500 million in annual aid is provided.
He's also concerned about CELAC's future (the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States). It's comprised of 33 countries. Potentially it's an OAS (Organization of American States) alternative.
Fulfillment remains a distant aspiration. Maduro hopes it'll achieve regional energy independence, social development in areas of food, health and education, beneficial environmental development, independence from predatory international lending agencies, and other benefits.
On February 23, 2010, it was established. It has miles to go to transform hope to fulfillment. The jury remains very much out.
Other regional countries also depend on Chavez. Bolivia is an important political and economic ally. So is Ecuador. 
Rafael Correa's presence in Havana to welcome Chavez on arrival signaled the importance of their relationship. 
He and others wonder if Chavismo will be the same without him. Hopefully they won't have to find out.
A Final Comment
Hope springs eternal. Reality can't be ducked. Family members, physicians, and government officials close to Chavez revealed little about his cancer.
It goes without saying that multiple surgeries for the same one in the same area give pause to worry. It's not a good sign.
At the same time, Chavez's age, indomitable spirit, and superb care offer hope for a full recovery. The will to live is a powerful positive force. It's pitted against an aggressive illness.
Dr. Salvador Navarrete claimed once to have been Chavez's personal physician. Venezuelan doctors said not so. More on their comments about him below.
On October 21, 2011, Medical News Today published his assessment of Chavez's health. The Mexican newspaper Milenio Semanal published them. He claimed the following:
"President Chavez has a tumor in the pelvis, called sarcoma. These are retroperitoneal tumors, at the base of the pelvis." 
"From an embryological point of view (how it started, its origin), it could be mesodermal, ectodermal or endodermal." 
"Information I have received from the family is that it is a sarcoma, an aggressive tumor with a very bad prognosis - and I am nearly completely certain this is true." 
"That is why he is undergoing such aggressive chemotherapy. If it were some kind of prostate cancer, he would be undergoing hormonal therapy which would hardly be noticeable."
He added that it's not prostate cancer. It's "very close to the prostate. (It) probably invade(d) the bladder (or) originate(d) in the bladder and is invading the pelvis."
"It is most likely a tumor on the lliopsoas muscle. (It) runs from the lumbar portion of the vertebral column to the femur….The cancer either started in the muscle or has settled there."
On October 22, 2011, Venezuela Analysis debunked Navarrete's diagnosis and prognosis. Venezuelan doctors headed by Fidel Ramirez accused him of "scientific negligence."
Ramirez's practice includes general medicine and gastroenterology. He, opthamologist Earle Siso Garcia, and trauma surgeon Rafael Vargas accused Navarrete of "daring to make diagnoses and prognoses without the necessary medical information, which we reiterate is completely unknown to him."
Ramirez said he "does not have, nor has he had any scientific information in order to be able to talk about the health of president Chavez, not even about the type of cancer he endured."
He may have had informal contact with him, but "it was never a physician-patient relationship. There is no truth to (his) comment."
A joint press conference statement on live television added that Navarrete "has not been President Chavez's physician, nor the family doctor of any of the President's relatives."
His comments were uncalled for. They violated medical ethics. They lack "scientific grounding." They're based on "an alleged medical examination in which Navarrete never took part."
Fourteen months later, Chavez underwent his fourth cancer surgery in 18 months for the same illness. Recovery chances at best are daunting. 
Hopefully they'll prove good. The fullness of time will have final say.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity."
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Israel's Lieberman Resigns

To contact us Click HERE

Israel's Lieberman Resigns
by Stephen Lendman
Lieberman and Netanyahu represent the worst of extremist governance. They're hardcore racists. They're ideologically anti-democratic. 
They believe Israel has a divine right to persecute, torture, commit naked aggression, and dominate the region unchallenged.
Their extremism might make some despots blush. They menace Israeli society, the region and beyond. They should be in prison, not high office. More on Lieberman below.
On December 14, he resigned as foreign minister and deputy prime minister. He vowed to clear his dirty name of all charges. Incriminating ones go back over a decade. 
He resigned five weeks before general elections. More on this below as well.
Years of investigation suggested major charges would follow. Only little fish face them. Big ones walk away or get off lightly.
Investigations into his alleged criminal wrongdoing began in the 1990s. In 2006, major malfeasance ones began. 
On August 2, 2009, police gave prosecutors clear evidence of fraud, accepting millions of dollars in bribe money, embezzlement, money laundering, and obstruction of justice. They recommended indictment. 
Others agree he's corrupt. On May 24, 2010, Israeli police also recommended charging him with breach of trust. He improperly received classified information about his criminal investigation. 
Earlier, on September 24, 2001, in Jerusalem District Court, he admitted attacking a 12-year old boy. The incident occurred in December 1999.
It was in Nokdim settlement. A young boy hit his son. He didn't harm him. 
Charged with assaulting and threatening a minor, Lieberman was convicted. He copped a plea, paid a small fine, and avoided harsher punishment.
Several times he said he'd resign as foreign minister, deputy prime minister, and Israeli Beiteinu party (Israel Our Home) leader. He'd only do it after a hearing if he agreed to one.
In spring 2011, reports suggested imminent graft charges. Police investigations and intelligence division head Yoav Segalovich recommended indictment. 
His case continued for over 18 months. Segalovich wanted him charged with bribery, fraud, money laundering, breach of trust, witness harassment, and obstruction of justice.
Police claimed he got over ten million New Israeli Shekels (NIS) in bribes from Martin Schlaff, Michael Chernoy, and other businessmen. He laundered the money through shell companies and fictitious overseas bank accounts.
Police also wanted him charged with breach of trust. It related to Israel's former Belarus ambassador, Ze'ev Ben Aryeh. He showed him secret documents pertaining to his own potential indictment. 
They contained evidence against him. Lieberman secured his appointment in return for services rendered.
At the time, negotiations with Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein sought to get bribery accusations dropped. Money laundering carries 10 years in prison. 
Conviction on all charges assures many more. For one of Israel's worst, life without parole would be too lenient.
On December 13, Israeli Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein said investigations into charges of bribery, fraud, money laundering, breach of trust, harassing witnesses, and perhaps other criminality ended.
Major accusations were dropped. Fraud and breach of trust remained. Lieberman's a serial felon. Clear evidence exists. Weinstein claimed otherwise. 
At the same time, he said "suspicions against Lieberman's series of intricate and intertwined, underhanded actions cannot be ruled out."
Suspicions after years of investigations assure new charges won't follow. Lieberman is largely off the hook. No Israeli except Netanyahu is less deserving. 
Lieberman denied wrongdoing. What else would he say? He charged police and prosecutors with witch-hunt justice. He vowed to clear his name.
Reports suggest he'll seek plea bargain leniency. It won't be the first time. His decision followed legal advice.
He wasn't forced to resign. He did so ahead of upcoming elections. Convicted felons don't help their party or coalition partner.
He'll seek reelection, nonetheless. "I believe that the citizens of the State of Israel are entitled to go to the polling stations after this matter is resolved," he said.
"I might continue to serve the State of Israel and the citizens of Israel as part of a strong and united leadership that will cope with the security, political and economic challenges" ahead.
On Friday, he said:
"I know I committed no crime."
"I decided to resign from my post as foreign minister and deputy prime minister." 
"I will now be able to end this matter quickly and without delays, and finally clear my name."
He's been hounded for years, he added. "Not a day passed without me being referred to as 'a suspect,' 'being under investigation,' (or) 'being an intelligence target.' "
"This has been one long and rolling case, receiving a different title every now and then."
Netanyahu had no comment on Friday. Hours ahead of Weinstein's decision, he said:
"I believe in Israel’s legal system and respect it. The right that it grants any Israeli citizen to defend himself also extends to Minister Lieberman, and I hope for him that he’ll be able to prove that he’s also innocent regarding the only case that remains."
He likely knew what was coming but hinted nothing.
Under Israeli law, when a cabinet minister resigns, the prime minister becomes "custodian" of his portfolio until a replacement is appointed.
Ahead of January 22 elections, expect Netanyahu to handle foreign affairs until they're concluded. 
What's ahead for Lieberman remains to be seen. He's an embarrassment to legitimate governance. He's an ultranationalist extremist.
He, Netanyahu, and likeminded extremists represent the lunatic fringe of Israeli politics.
In his youth, Lieberman was a Kach party member. He remains true to its ideological roots. The difference between Kach and Yisrael Beiteinu are miniscule.
Meir Kahane headed Israel's Kach Party. In 1988, Israel banned it. It was too extreme to tolerate. It institutionalized the worst form of racist hate, nationalist extremism, and bloodthirstiness.
Hebrew University Professor Zeev Sternhell once called Lieberman "perhaps the most dangerous politician in the history of the state of Israel."
Rabbi Eric Yoffie, President of the Union for Reform Judaism, described him as "outrageous, abominable, hate-filled, (and) brimming with incitement that, if left unchecked, could lead Israel to the gates of hell."
David A. Harris, the American Jewish Committee's Executive Director, said he "define(s) an entire class of Israelis as suspected traitors."
"An unnamed Meretz party member said "If you liked Mussolini, if you were missing Stalin, you'll love Lieberman."
Gideon Levy equated Lieberman with Kahane. What was once "ostracized is now acceptable." It reflects "the slippery slope down which Israeli society has skidded over the past two decades."
Even ultra-Zionist US publisher Martin Peretz called him "neo-fascist….a certified gangster….the Israeli equivalent of (Austrian politician) Jorg Haider."
In 2000, Israel barred him from Israel for his hard-right views. He publicly supported Nazism, anti-Semitism, and xenophobia.
Lieberman spurns basic ethics, morality, rule of law principles and democratic values. He's bad news for Israel, Palestine and humanity.
In 1958, he was born Evet Lvovich Lieberman in Moldova (a former Soviet Republic). He once worked as a nightclub bouncer.
In 1978, he moved to Israel with his parents. After IDF service, his political career began.
In the 1980s, he helped found the Zionist Forum for Soviet Jewry. He was also a Board of the Jerusalem Economic Corporation member and Secretary of the Jerusalem branch of Israel's "national workers union," the Histadrut Ovdim Le'umit.
From 1993 - 1997, he was Director General for the Likud party. At the same time, he was Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's chief of staff during his first term. 
In 1999, he established the far-right, ultranationalist Israel Beiteinu Party (Israel is Our Home). He became a MK. He's also held other positions.
They included Minister of National Infrastructure, Minister of Transportation, and, until resigning December 14, foreign minister and deputy prime minister.
He once called peace with Palestinians unattainable. He stressed "not next year and not for the next generation."
"Our proposal," he said, "is: No to unilateral concessions, no to continuing the settlement freeze, yes to serious negotiations, and mutual gestures of good faith." 
He offers none of his own. He stresses Israel "should prepare for war and be strong." He wants Greater Israel Arab-free. He leaves nothing too extreme off the table to achieve it.
Earlier he called for hanging all Arab MKs for treason. He urged destroying Palestinian society.
He said "(I)t would be better to drown (Palestinian) prisoners in the Dead Sea if possible, since that's the lowest point in the world."
As transportation minister at the time, he expressed willingness to supply buses to expedite the mission.
He believes "pandering" to international opinion is weakness, not strength.
Palestinian supporters call him the racist right's most prominent spokesman. With him in high office, Arabs face horrific persecution, ultimate expulsion, and possible extermination.
A Final Comment
On December 14, Haaretz criticized Weinstein going soft on Lieberman. "Heads must roll," it headlined. Law enforcement "badly shot itself in the foot." 
MK Lieberman was indicted on minor charges, "not the deputy prime minister or the foreign minister."
"The place for a (criminally indicted) minister….is not in the cabinet." It's not in any position of authority, great or minor.
Civil servants charged with criminal offenses would be sacked or otherwise forced to resign. "This rule must apply to elected officials as well."
Lieberman's legal fate remains to be determined. At worst, he'll receive minor punishment. 
April 2011 headlines said his indictment for money laundering and other major crimes was imminent. "Weinstein failed to explain (why he) changed his mind."
Serious "soul-searching" is needed. Weinstein "must take personal responsibility." His style law enforcement is unconscionable. 
Haaretz barely stopped short of demanding his resignation. Letting Lieberman off the hook makes him criminally complicit.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity."
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Gun Violence in America

To contact us Click HERE

Gun Violence in America
by Stephen Lendman
US civilian gun ownership is the highest worldwide. Yemen ranks second. America doubles the Yemeni level.
Gun related violence follows. In America it's endemic. In Chicago alone, gun-related deaths exceed one a day. More Chicagoans are shot and killed than US forces in Afghanistan by any means.
Gun ownership makes it simple as ready, aim, fire. It lowers the threshold between anger and homicide. Proliferation in society leaves everyone vulnerable.
On Friday, 28 Sandy Hook Elementary School Newtown, CT children and teachers were murdered. A heavily armed 20-year old man used semiautomatic pistols and a semiautomatic rifle.It was the third deadliest gun-related massacre in US history. 
The second worst occurred on Blacksburg, VA Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University's campus. On April 16, 2007, 33 students and teachers were shot and killed. Others were wounded.
In January 1923, shootings and other violence killed 150 Rosewood, FL Blacks. No convictions followed. 
Governor lawton Chiles (1991 - 1998) later called what happened a "blind act of bigotry." In 2004, Florida declared Rosewood a state Heritage Landmark. Survivors of dead victims are unforgiving.
Numerous other gun-related lesser scale massacres pockmark US history. The right to own, conceal, and use assault and other deadly weapons is an ugly America tradition. It's long past time it ended.
On November 18, 2012, the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence said "epidemic levels of gun violence (claim) over 30,000 lives annually.” US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data document it.
Every gun-related death leaves two others wounded. Every year, about 100,000 Americans are gun violence victims. Countless others are irreparably harmed. Nothing whatever is done to curb or prevent what's shocking and intolerable.
The 1968 Gun Control Act fell woefully short. Federal regulation enacted was weak and ineffective. Gun manufacturers supported the measure. 
It prohibits interstate firearms transfers except among licensed manufacturers, dealers and importers. It did nothing to curb gun proliferation across America.
In 1982, a Senate Judiciary Committee report claimed "the second amendment to our Constitution was intended as an individual right of the American citizen to keep and carry arms in a peaceful manner, for the protection of himself, his family, and his freedoms."
Ignored was that so called individual rights violate those of most others. Death or injury by gun violence in American exceeds vulnerability anywhere else and then some.
US communities are unsafe. Police on routine street or traffic patrol wear bulletproof vests for protection. At one time, it was unheard of. Today it's standard practice.
Gun violence touches every segment of society. It happens on streets, in homes, at work, in schools, numerous other places, and by self-inflicted shootings. 
Major incidents like Virginia Tech and Norwalk, CT make headlines. Thousands of other shootings go unnoticed.
CDC calls firearm deaths "an important public health concern." Congress dismisses it. Vulnerability to domestic gun-related death or injury exceeds some US war theaters. 
Instead of shocking politicians to act, they support the virtual unrestricted right to bear arms. Automatic ones are prohibited. They're easily obtained, nonetheless. Powerful semi-automatic assault ones are freely bought and sold.
Eastcoastfirearms.com lists numerous ones for sale. They include AK-47 (Kalashnikov) assault rifles, AR-15/M16 type rifles, Uzi assault weapons, LWRC M6A2s (called the most modern carbine rifle in the world), and various others with considerable firepower.
Progressive jurists and others take issue with modern-day Second Amendment interpretation. It states:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Journalist/historian Garry Wills calls supportive Second Amendment  views muddled and tendentious. Their arguments replicate insurrectionist ones.
"Only madmen, one would think, can suppose that militias have a constitutional right to levy war against the United States, which is treason by constitutional definition."
"Yet the body of writers who proclaim themselves at the scholarly center of the Second Amendment’s interpretation say that a well-regulated body authorized by the government is intended to train itself for action against the government."
He added that "Perhaps it is the quality of their arguments that makes them hard to take seriously."
In 2008, a District of Columbia v. Heller Supreme Court amicus curiae submitted by 15 prominent academics and writers concluded as follows:
"Historians are often asked what the Founders would think about various aspects of contemporary life. Such questions can be tricky to answer." 
"But as historians of the Revolutionary era we are confident at least of this: that the authors of the Second Amendment would be flabbergasted to learn that in endorsing the republican principle of a well-regulated militia, they were also precluding restrictions on such potentially dangerous property as firearms, which governments had always regulated when there was 'real danger of public injury from individuals.' "
Law Professor David C. Williams says Second Amendment interpretation reflects myths about America. The framers believed in unity, he said.
Modern interpreters endorse distrust and disunity, he believes. The Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to bear arms only as part of a united and consensual people, he stresses.
Obtaining guns today is almost as easy as buying toothpaste. America's framers had no such intention in mind. Constitutional reinventionists decided they knew best. 
Modern US culture is violent. Gun ownership bears much responsibility. Violent films are some of the most popular. So are similar video games and music. Lyrics glorify guns, rape and murder.
US society is called a "rape culture" for good reason. Sometime during their lives, one-fourth of adult women are victimized by forcible rape. Often it's by someone they know. Family members share guilt.
One in four women report being sexually molested in childhood. Repeat violations over extended periods are commonplace. Three-fourth of US women experience some form of extreme violence in their lifetimes.
Domestic violence is the leading cause of injury. It's the second leading cause of death. Guns play a leading role. Children, like adults, are harmed.
What kind of country facilitates endemic violence instead of acting responsibly to curb it? What kind of government endorses easy access to dangerous assault and other deadly weapons instead of prohibiting it?
Against this backdrop, no wonder massacres like Norwalk, CT, Virginia Tech, Columbine High School, Atlanta, GA stock trader killings, six by a lone Fort Worth gunman, 10 Washington, DC sniper shootings, a Carnation, WA Christmas eve massacre, Northern IL University killings, 13 more at Ft. Hood, the Tuscon, AR incident killing six and leaving Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords seriously wounded, as well as dozens more incidents too numerous to mention.
No wonder domestic violence is out-of-control. Lone gunmen incidents reflect ingrained values. So does America's history. It's notably harsh against dissidents, labor, minorities, street protesters, ethnic and religious groups, as well as others targeted.
Most one-on-one incidents pass without notice. US history is sanitized to forget what's too monstrous to remember. Native Americans were nearly slaughtered to extinction.
Black slaves endured whippings, other beatings, rapes, mutilations, forced family separations, and even amputations as punishment for runaways.
Jim Crow America endorsed white supremacy. Forced segregation still exists. Latinos, Muslims, and other disadvantaged people face state-sponsored repression.
America is the only industrialized country negligent for having failed to address gun violence responsibly. 
On average, eight times more fatalities result than in other developed countries. For children under 15, it's 12 times higher.
Few federal gun laws exist. Ones enacted are pockmarked with loopholes. Some states make guns as simple to buy as blueberry pie. Many others aren't far behind.
Anyone get obtain dangerous semi-automatic weapons able to claim multiple victims in seconds. Some US communities are near-war zones.
Economic duress makes violent crime more likely. Many people fear going out at night. Some do in daylight. 
In the 1990s, murders happened every 22 minutes, rapes every five minutes, robberies every 49 seconds, and burglaries every 10 seconds. Given today's hard times, it's likely these numbers are much higher.
In 2010, the FBI reported 1,246,248 violent crimes and another 9,082,887 nonviolent ones. In 2011, violent crime jumped 18%.
Numbers vary year by year, but grand totals compared to other industrialized nations explain best. Violence in America is endemic. 
Death or injury from guns is out-of-control. Government officials able to act responsibly abstain. In September 2008, Obama said "I'm not going to take away your guns."
Last July, White House spokesman Jay Carney said:
"The president believes we need to take common sense measures that protect the Second Amendment rights of Americans while ensuring that those who should not have guns under existing laws do not get them."
He kept his promise on ownership. He spurned gun control advocates. He signed measures permitting guns in national parks and on Amtrak.
He did nothing to ban assault weapons. He allows gun show loopholes. Convicted violent felons can easily buy weapons there with no ID. So can anyone able to afford them. 
Political Washington facilitates gun ownership. Neither party supports curbing gun-related homicides and injuries. They prefer gun lobby cash to safe streets and communities. 
Don't expect either party to change gun policy. They support wrong over right across the board. They do it with impunity. No wonder America threatens humanity at home and abroad. Rogue leaders made planet earth unsafe to live on.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity."
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

12 Aralık 2012 Çarşamba

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

To contact us Click HERE
From SSRN:
  • Robert L. Tsai, The Politics of Hate, (Journal of Hate Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2012).
  • Sahar F. Aziz, Federal Civil Rights Engagement with Arab and Muslim American Communities Post 9/11, (November 9, 2012).
  • Solomon A. M. Ekwenze, The Moral and Legal Frontiers of Homosexuality, Lesbianism and Gayism: A Paradox for the Third Millennium, (November 11, 2012).
  • Linda Ross Meyer, Law's Suffering, (December 5, 2012).
  • Haider Ala Hamoudi, Book Review: Islamic Law in Action, Authority, Discretion and Everyday Experiences in Mamluk Egypt, by Kristen Stilt, (Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2013).
  • Max D. Siegel, The Future of Family, (George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal (CRLJ), Vol. 23, No. 2, 2013).
  • Norman P. Ho, Confucian Jurisprudence in Practice: Pre-Tang Dynasty Panwen (Written Legal Judgments), (Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, Forthcoming).
From elsewhere:
  • Stuart G. White, Religious Exemptions: An Egalitarian Demand?, [Abstract], The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 97-118 (Dec. 2012).
  • Maimon Schwarzschild, How Much Autonomy Do You Want?, Conversations, The Journal of the Institute for Jewish Ideas and Ideals, Issue 14, Dec. 7, 2012.
Recent Books:
  • Richard A. Hughes, Religion, Law and the Present Water Crisis, (Peter Lang Publishing, 2012), [Press Release].
  • Wael B. Hallaq, The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity's Moral Predicament, (Columbia Univ. Press, Nov. 2012).
  • Kimberley Brownlee, Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience, (Oxford Univ. Press, Dec. 2012).

Court Finds North Carolina's Pro-Life Plates Unconstitutional

To contact us Click HERE
In American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina v. Conti, (ED NC, Dec. 7, 2012), a North Carolina federal district court held that North Carolina's "offering of a Choose Life license plate in the absence of a pro-choice plate constitutes viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment." The court reached this conclusion after rejecting arguments that the specialty license plate program was government speech. The court pointed out that the North Carolina legislature, with rancorous debate, rejected six proposals for various pro-choice plates. The ACLU issued a press release announcing the decision.  CNN reports on the decision.